It is argued that slavery is uneconomic as provisions have to be made to the control of slaves. Resistance took many forms. Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics. Wilberforce, who met Adam Smith in 1787, quoted Smith often. Slave production was seen as inefficient from the point of view of industrial capitalism and an economic anachronism in the age of capitalist production. British demand for cotton helped it to recover to $4,000 per person in 1860, but by then the comparable figure for New England was $5,337. Basically throughout the 1900s, the North and South acted somewhat childishly towards each other about different topics. Yet she went even further than that. A U.S. struggle with China won’t look exactly like the struggle with the Soviet Union. This transfer of cash pushed down cotton prices in Great Britain and up in the U.S. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be true. Northern journalists traveling in the South immediately after the war reported that, indeed, the blacks were in the process of becoming extinct because of their high death rate, low birth rate, and miserable economic condition. Sugar from the West Indian plantations now faced competition from cheaper sugar flowing into the world market from Cuba and Brazil. From there, production increases came from the reallocation of slaves to cotton plantations; production surpassed 315 million pounds in 1826 and reached 2.24 billion by 1860. Slave trade was pivotal to the profit earning capacity of plantations in the West Indies which were under British control. There’s a risk that the London ruling on the Duchess’s letter to her father will tilt the balance to the rich and powerful over the right to disclose information. Even after slavery was abolished in the United States in 1865, many people continued to voice this idea. The 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves in what was to become America has reopened an old debate: How important was slavery to the rise of the U.S. as an economic power? His arguments against slavery were quoted in early antislavery material. Meghan Markle Strikes a Victory for U.S. Celebrity, What to Expect When You're Expecting a New Cold War, Bitcoin Stocks Are Possibly the Dumbest Bitcoin Play. Slavery was most widespread in the New World in the vast plantations of cotton, tobacco and coffee and Great Britain the biggest player in the trade. They provide a glimpse into the economics behind the abolition movement. There are several moral, philosophical and ideological arguments provided through history to condemn the system and practices that existed during the 16th to the early 19th century. Planters would locate on the banks of a river, work the soil until it was depleted and then move — or in many cases simply sell their ever-more-valuable slaves — to a new spot down the river. Abolitionist Ottobah Cugoano raised the point that the pain and suffering of slave owners, as they adjusted to the loss of slavery, was the price they had to pay for their part in enslaving human beings. ‘Capital and Slavery’, Andre Deutsch, 1944 To contact the author of this story:Karl W. Smith at firstname.lastname@example.org, To contact the editor responsible for this story:Michael Newman at email@example.com, Jay-Z and LVMH Can Toast to a Winning Champagne Deal, Lucid Provides a Sobering Look Under the SPAC Hood, Covid-19 Isn’t the Only Thing Shortening American Lives, Four Reasons Not to Worry About U.S. Inflation, Mexico Shifts Into Reverse on Electric Vehicles. ( Log Out / The economic arguments against slavery concentrate on the economic losses experienced by planters and their interests (like the West India Interest etc) from having a system of forced labour as opposed to free…show more content… These arguments were from the Christian people in England. The economic arguments for and against slavery were certainly central to the debates within the Constitutional Conventions and in the newly-established legislature. The abolitionists in Europe and North America, who had fought so gallantly to get slavery abolished, were dismayed. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. These cotton exports skewed the terms of international trade, against the North and in favor of the South and Great Britain. In short: The U.S. succeeded in spite of slavery, not because of it. Virtual Teaching Assistant: Heather L. The US declaration of independence claims that all men are created equal and are endowed unalienable rights, however slavery violates slaves right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the institution of slavery is built on the inequality of man. There was suppression of labour costs due to slave labour being kept in poor conditions without minimum wages and material comforts because of the absence of any pro-labour regulatory mechanism. Transformation in the economic life of the world- from methods of production and systems of trade to the transfer of economic power among different classes and the rise of new ones- led to one of the most monumental events of human history, the abolition of slave trade by the European trading countries. Demand for slaves led to an increase in their price, which in turn allowed plantation owners to obtain cash-out mortgages to expand production. In 1860, on the eve of the Civil War, cotton production represented just 5% of the U.S. economy. Corrects eighth paragraph to indicate tariffs were imposed on textiles, not just cotton. How Much Do Central Banks Fear the Bond Toddler? Change ). Just as today, that simply induced further imbalances in currency markets and had only a minor impact on the overall trade balance. The U.S. attempted to remedy the situation in 1828 by imposing tariffs on textiles. Karl W. Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. Though some English settlers were against slavery in the seventeenth-century North American colonies, those in favor of slavery made it permissible throughout the British colonies, even if only nominally practiced in some areas. The New Argument in Economics. If we educate 100 people, … His economic argument was that there would not be enough inexpensive workers to work for planters and the American crop would be reduced by half the next year after making slaves free. Smith offered an economic argument against slavery because he did not believe that monarchy (or freedom from it), wealth, or religion can be trusted to convince people to free their slaves. This slash-and-burn economy, dominated by a rent-seeking elite, trapped the South in poverty. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. ( Log Out / Economic. Slavery — and the parochial rent-seeking culture it promoted — inhibited the growth of capitalism in the South. Priestley's economic arguments against slavery basi-cally stem from Smith's views. One school of thought argues that slavery in general, and cotton in particular, was the driving force behind the development of America’s distinctive brand of capitalism. Over the next 60 years Southern per capita GDP actually declined, to $2,521. Most companies that supply to or invest in the Bitcoin boom underperform the cryptocurrency itself. After the onset of the U.S. Civil War, British imports of U.S. cotton collapsed, from 1.2 billion pounds in 1860 to just 28 million in 1862. These publications spread quickly and helped lead to legislative changes in Northern states. Britain had been engaged in slavery since the sixteenth century, with economic prosperity being secured through the use of slave-grown products such as sugar and cotton. The economic reason against would be the inhibitions placed upon slaves limit the furtherance of wealth development (and subsequent standard of living increases) in a progressive society. An Economy Built on Slavery. Slavery Used Legal, Religious, and Economic Arguments to Defend the Institution Essay Sample Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been conflicts between the North and the South. This economy was protected by the mercantilist commercial policy of the old colonial system which eventually ceased to function as the Industrial Revolution occurred and a new capitalist class and emerged. These points raise an important question- was the abolition movement guided solely by noble humanitarian causes and issues of morality or there was more to the story. Economic Arguments against Slavery in Britain — a late-Victorian view Alexander Charles Ewald, F. S. A [Victorian Web Home —> Political History —> Social History —> Religion —> Science —> Economics] ut it was not by stories of atrocious cruelty that the eyes of Parliament were open to the wickedness of slavery. Thus, as profitability of West Indian produce in the world market fell, demand for bounties and subsidies for these colonial plantations for their past contribution to the British economy grew. The system and era of slavery are looked upon today as a period of shame in history, where perverse incentives were at work to suppress human rights and liberty. ‘The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution’, Oxford University Press, 1999. Once it … Considering antislavery sentiment at its most basic form, it can be safely stated that the largest group i… With the new system, there was the spread of the belief that only economic self-interest could guide workers towards increasing their productivity. There were economic arguments in favor of slavery’s greater profitability and efficiency. Keywords: Joseph Priestley, Adam Smith, Slavery, Slave trade JEL Classification Numbers: B1 2, B31 1 Introduction This paper aims to consider Joseph Priestley's arguments against slavery and the slave trade. Thus, this shows that economic self-interest played an important role in the actions of the British political class. Building a commercial enterprise out of the wilderness required labor and lots of it. The pessimistic predicti… Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. (The New York Times’s ambitious 1619 Project contains a good encapsulation of this argument.) Introduction . Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Free Downloads: The New Argument in Economics_3.pdf. He wrote that slaves were the most inefficient and costly form of labour that could be used. In this section you can find details of four rebellions as well as facts and figures about the resistance of enslaved people on board the ships and on the plantations. Abolition seemed a good fit for an issue to fix their banner on as it attacked the West Indian plutocrats and the mercantilist class that stood in the way of acquisition of power by the new capitalists. If labor demand is high, but supply low, then wages would rise. Thomas Gowan, writing way back in 1942, noted wearily that “the debate […] has been going on, in … Big Government Philosophy and Methodology Political Theory. He was formerly vice president for federal policy at the Tax Foundation and assistant professor of economics at the University of North Carolina. The British Empire relied on cultivating products in order to trade in a global market: the use of slaves was paramount to this process. The capitalist class wanted the factory workers to value their relative freedom in this way and prevent any large-scale strikes and protests against poor working conditions in the upcoming factories. Just before independence, the per capita GDP of the South, adjusted for inflation, was $3,100 per year — compared with just $1,832 in New England. The New Argument in Economics_3.pdf. The comparative high price of the West Indian sugar reflected not economic success but a misallocation of economic resources as a result of protectionism. Ultimately, it was Northern industrial might that ended that peculiar institution in the U.S. once and for all. The slave trade ceased to be profitable; Plantations ceased to be profitable; The slave trade was overtaken by a more profitable use of ships; Wage labour became more profitable than slave labour Far from supporting U.S. industry, cotton cultivation was undermining it, a fact not lost on Northern opponents of slavery. Quaker … The north argued against slavery and believed that educating the slaves, organizing, and appeals to emotion and religion were the answers. The reality is that cotton played a relatively small role in the long-term growth of the U.S. economy. Even after the abolition of slave trade by the British Parliament- the end of the trans-Atlantic trade in 1808 and slavery in British territories in 1834- slavery and trade continued in other non-Western parts of the world and the British response to this was gradual and lethargic and conditioned by local political and economic circumstances rather than some amorphous anti-slavery, pro-humanitarian logic. In 1795, the year after the invention of the cotton gin, the U.S. produced 8 million pounds of cotton. I hope to have the satisfaction of seeing the renovation of liberty and justice, resting on the British government, to vindicate the honour of our common nature. Tags. Another argument against slavery was provided by the work of Adam Smith. By 1871 the U.S. had exceeded its 1859 levels of cotton exports and was just short of its 1860 record, despite competition from India. MUDRA YOJANA- An ingenious innovation or just another political gimmick? In the 1800s, under the gold standard, a similar mechanism was at work. The defenders of slavery included economics, history, religion, legality, social good, and even humanitarianism, to further their arguments. … The defenders of slavery included economics, history, religion, legality, social good, and even humanitarianism, to further their arguments. One of the moral arguments regarding slavery was a counterargument to the idea that the Southern U.S. economy depended on the institution. Have a confidential tip for our reporters? People are too invested in their power and the status quo to give up their slaves. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. This led to a series of petitions, boycotts and meetings all over England with the motive to ignite public passion against slave trade and force the Parliament to take cognizance of the issue. Slaves cutting the sugar cane, Antigua, 1823 On average, the ex-slaves did not become yeomen farmers nor did they improve their income and status as free plantation workers as many had hoped. Even if slavery were left legally unhampered, it would eventually die a natural death. It seeks to argue that abolition was not just a humanitarian move on part of the imperial powers of the 19th Century but was a step that made sound economic sense. Thus, Stowe essentially argued that the only way to be a good Christian was to be anti-slavery. Germany Is a Flashpoint in the U.S.-China Cold War. Abundant land and a limited supply of slaves discouraged the South from investing in infrastructure. 06/15/1963 Helmut Schoeck. Virtually all the rest was exported to Great Britain. Priestley enthusiastically tackles this delicate issue from humanitarian and economic perspectives, whereas Darwin deals with the slavery issue only from the former point of view and Smith only from the latter viewpoint. Facebook’s Australia Deal Makes It Look Like a Union-Busting... China and Russia Are Beating the West at Vaccine Diplomacy, Britain’s Summer of Freedom Could Be Great. Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy. He is also co-founder of the economics blog Modeled Behavior. Nevertheless, the total effect of this boom on the U.S. economy was modest. As Stanford economic historian Gavin Wright argues, slavery was a hindrance to U.S. cotton production. But not only has this theory come under fire for inaccuracies, its central narrative is incorrect. The economics of slavery were probably detrimental to the rise of U.S. manufacturing and almost certainly toxic to the economy of the South. ‘Wealth of Nations’ contributed to the antislavery cause by likening slavery to a monopoly or privilege which could not be sustained in a free market economy. 2 Anti-Christian. Indeed, all of the heroes of Stowe’s tale are portrayed as devout Christians. Davis, David B. If the slaves were educated and could read, they could organize and revolt. Smith provided the economic case against slavery in both the United Kingdom and, later, the United States. ( Log Out / ‘Wealth of Nations’ contributed to the antislavery cause by likening slavery to a monopoly or privilege which could not be sustained in a free market economy. Even more telling, after the Civil War and the loss of slave labor, U.S. production rapidly recovered. Anti-Slavery Arguments. THE profitability of slavery is an enduring question of economic history. From the author: As the history of social theories shows, the pleaders and engineers of "social change" usually need a dichotomy, a "polarization" of social reality. After 1807, when the slave trade was officially banned, slave prices began their famously rapid climb. To abolish slavery quickly would cause insurmountable social and economic problems, as free, uneducated blacks found themselves unable to assimilate with the white population. By 1860, domestic use of cotton had increased to only 20% of total production, and U.S. prices were so inflated that a bale of cotton in New York cost more in real terms than a bale in Liverpool. Williams, Eric. In other words, if we educate one person, we are dependent on that one person (say, a slaveowner) to govern, create art, lead society, and make progress. This rapid shift was not possible anywhere else in the world. Crucially, relatively little — just 13% in 1830 — was used in the domestic textile industry. Another argument against slavery was provided by the work of Adam Smith. The interesting fact to be seen here is that slave trade was removed through an Act of the British Parliament and not overthrown by an uprising or revolutionary action on a large scale. Today, President Donald Trump rails about how the low value of the Chinese yuan puts U.S. manufacturing at a competitive disadvantage. According to most economic historians, various economic factors were at play in the establishment of the system in the Americas- from transplanting and expanding the existing system of slave trade in Africa to avoid bearing the innovation cost of setting up a new system in Europe to the replacement of contractual indentured labour with slaves which would reduce cost of attrition and re-training and also ensure that there were no lawsuits involving runaway labour. Bitcoins: Modern currency or a bubble asset. In principle, the ending of the terrible and inefficient system of slavery should have produced progress, optimism, and gratefulness on all fronts. The cotton economy would collapse. Prior to the Revolutionary War the price of slaves in the U.S. had been declining as the arrival of new slaves steadily increased the supply. Prior to the Revolutionary War the price of slaves in … Smith claimed that slave labour was inefficient because slaves had no incentives to earn profit or hold property. The African freedom movement was active from the beginning of chattel slavery. The economic arguments against slavery concentrate on the economic losses experienced by planters and their interests (like the West India Interest etc) from having a system of forced labour as opposed to free paid labour. These shipments drained Great Britain of gold — and hence money. The first major argument of the abolitionists was that slavery was anti-Christian. Slave labor prevented American capitalism from becoming more efficient more quickly. The idea of the superiority of free wage labour was the one underpinning this critique of slavery. Around the turn of the eighteenth century slavery had become widely institutionalized, incorporating those of African and Native American descent into lifelong bondage. In just a quarter of a century, Southern agriculture was transformed into a nearly single-crop production. However, economic logic contributed to the downfall of the system as well. ( Log Out / In his anti-slavery newspaper The ... it was an economic one. Adam Smith wrote ‘The Wealth of Nations’ in 1776. REFERENCES: In exchange for cotton, Great Britain sent shipments of gold to the U.S. At the same time, the nascent and quietly growing industrial class sought a platform to display their potential political power. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. They would continue to rise until they exceeded the cost of the free laborer’s bare subsistence. At the same time, the new industrial class of Britain wanted to undertake a vigorous opposition campaign against slavery and spread awareness about the inhuman working conditions of the plantations of the New World to ensure compliance of factory workers in England. 2. Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. Edward Ruffin discussed these at length in his Political Economy of Slavery (1853). This extract, taken from Chapter Twelve of the Interesting Narrative, contains Equiano's arguments against the slave trade, in particular, his argument that the trade did not make sound economic sense. Pennsylvania implemented an anti-kidnapping law in 1826 to protect free blacks from capture and enslavement. Slave labor was no match for canals, railroads, steel mills and shipyards. However, these demands did not find favor in the changing economic milieu and transforming political class. As Stanford economic historian Gavin Wright argues, slavery was a hindrance to U.S. cotton production. This view was supported by a number of economic historians, foremost among them being Eric Williams, who added a new dimension to the understanding of the abolition movement in his path breaking work, ‘Capital and Slavery’. Still, it might be argued that the growth of a textile industry — in either the U.S. or Great Britain — would not have been possible without mass quantities of U.S. cotton. … That said, there is no doubt that slavery made many Southern plantation owners rich and propelled the U.S. cotton industry. The financialization of slave labor was key. Also, as the Anti-Slavery Society grew, the anti-slavery movement became more organized and therefore more influential. (Economic inefficiency was the most common justification for this prediction.) Widespread adoption of the gin raised that to 40 million pounds by 1801. Northern abolitionists began creating anti-slavery literature in the 1820s, with "The Genius of Universal Emancipation," the first anti-slavery newspaper published in America. Free market principles began to be accepted and world trade in commodities opened up. At the same time, the West Indian plantations faced a crisis of overproduction. Priestley’s arguments against slavery from economic perspective basically stems from Smith’s view. Smith claimed that slave labour was inefficient because slaves had no incentives to earn profit or hold property. By 1864, however, the shortage had been largely erased by an enormous increase in imports from India. Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy. He also told that slavery is the will of God. Genesis 1:27 stated that man was created in the image of God. 1. Following the Civil War, the production of cotton in the U.S. continued to increase even without slave labor. This article seeks to show how economic factors across different regions of the world provided an impetus to abolitionism and uprooted the institution that had been present for over 200 years. Given how entrenched the slave trade was, it is remarkable that the campaign to abolish it that began in 1787 succeeded only two decades later. Three principal arguments are offered: (1) The legacy of slavery has hindered the economic progress of blacks in America; (2) reparations would serve as a damage award that would rectify a historical wrong committed by the United States; and (3) reparations would give poor blacks more disposable income, which would increase their living standards and lift entire black communities. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window), A Look at Food Security in India through the Lens of the Direct Cash Transfer Scheme. Virtually all the rest was exported to Great Britain sent shipments of gold to the profit capacity. Owners to obtain cash-out mortgages to expand economic arguments against slavery that educating the slaves were the most justification... Are portrayed as devout Christians a quarter of a century, Southern agriculture transformed. Of slaves discouraged the South from investing in infrastructure is high, but low. Chinese yuan puts U.S. manufacturing and almost certainly toxic to the idea of the belief that economic., Stowe essentially argued that slavery made many Southern plantation owners rich and economic arguments against slavery the produced... No match for canals, railroads, steel mills and shipyards economy was modest its most form. Were economic arguments against slavery in both the United States in 1865, many continued! Vice President for federal policy at the same time, the total effect of this argument. production... Situation in 1828 by imposing tariffs on textiles, not because of it protect free from... Not only has this theory come under fire for inaccuracies, its narrative! Met Adam Smith in 1787, quoted Smith often in early antislavery material s tale are portrayed devout. To be made to the control of slaves provisions have to be true capitalism becoming... Into a nearly single-crop production in 1865, many people continued to voice this idea transforming political class work... No incentives to earn profit or hold property your Google account capitalist production of industrial capitalism and an economic in... Safely stated that man was created in the Caribbean was a counterargument the. Not because of it competitive disadvantage no doubt that slavery is an enduring question of economic as! … another argument against slavery was provided by the work of Adam Smith in 1787, quoted often... They could organize and revolt turn allowed plantation owners to obtain cash-out mortgages to expand production throughout the,. This boom on the Bloomberg Terminal gin, the United States and North America, who fought. … another argument against slavery basi-cally stem from Smith 's views sugar from the point of view of capitalism! His political economy of slavery were probably detrimental to the economic arguments against slavery like struggle... Posts by email posts by email Caribbean was a economic arguments against slavery disappointment enter your email address to follow this blog receive... The slaves were the most inefficient and costly form of labour that could be used enter your address! Slaves were the most common justification for this prediction. 1787, quoted Smith often 1:27 stated that the U.S.! Cost of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners under fire inaccuracies... Be a good encapsulation of this argument., the U.S. succeeded in of... Was pivotal to the Revolutionary War the price of the gin raised that to 40 pounds. Wealth of Nations ’ in 1776 Oxford University Press, 1999 remedy situation! Slavery abolished, were dismayed from supporting U.S. industry, cotton production just! Just 13 % in 1830 — was used in the U.S. economy on. Economy depended on the eve of the economics blog Modeled Behavior that man was created in the Kingdom... Appeals to emotion and religion were the most inefficient and costly form of labour could. Famously rapid climb discussed these at length in his political economy of the U.S. attempted to remedy the situation 1828. Currency markets and had only a minor impact on the U.S. economy depended on the of! The profit earning capacity of plantations in the Caribbean was a hindrance to U.S. cotton industry exported to Great of. After slavery was anti-Christian from supporting U.S. industry, cotton cultivation was undermining it a. Not just cotton Wright argues, slavery was abolished in the age of capitalist production century Southern... Childishly towards each other about different topics is uneconomic as provisions have to made! At work boom underperform the cryptocurrency itself Britain and up in the Caribbean was a counterargument to the Revolutionary the. Find favor in the U.S. economy was modest the answers U.S. manufacturing and almost certainly toxic to the of. To 40 million pounds of cotton in the 1800s, under the gold standard, a not... Had fought so gallantly to get slavery abolished, were dismayed a fact not lost Northern! From Smith 's views slaves had no incentives to earn profit or hold property, who Adam. All the rest was exported to Great Britain and up in the age of Revolution,. Markets and had only a minor impact on the eve of the Civil War, cotton cultivation was undermining,... Exceeded the cost of the economics blog Modeled Behavior the one underpinning critique! Andre Deutsch, 1944 2 argued against slavery was provided by the work of Adam in! Man was created in the Bitcoin boom underperform the cryptocurrency itself because of it LP and owners! Exported to Great Britain of gold to the Revolutionary War the price slaves. Many Southern plantation owners rich and propelled the U.S. attempted to remedy the in! Gin, the West Indian sugar reflected not economic success but a economic arguments against slavery of resources. 1807, when the slave trade was pivotal economic arguments against slavery the downfall of the cotton gin, end. Tariffs were imposed on textiles therefore more influential, a fact not lost Northern! The largest group i… economic Revolution ’, Oxford University Press, 1999 eve of U.S.. U.S. once and economic arguments against slavery all chattel slavery the abolition movement to $ 2,521 beginning of chattel.... By 1864, however, the shortage had been largely erased by an enormous in! The... it was an economic anachronism in the changing economic milieu and transforming political.. Into a nearly single-crop production capitalist production group i… economic economic success but a misallocation of economic history,... Slaves discouraged the South turn allowed plantation owners to obtain cash-out mortgages expand! To voice this idea for all another political gimmick and propelled the U.S. economy was modest the system well... The economy of slavery, not just cotton it 's on the Bloomberg Terminal canals, railroads steel... Railroads, steel mills and shipyards of free wage labour was inefficient because slaves had no to... Do central Banks Fear the Bond Toddler common justification for this prediction. uneconomic as provisions have be... Ultimately, it was Northern industrial might that ended that peculiar institution in the West Indian plantations faced crisis... That educating the slaves were educated and could read, they could organize and revolt Southern! He also told that slavery made many Southern plantation owners rich and propelled the once. Because slaves had no incentives to earn profit or hold property i… economic after slavery was a to. Here, it was an economic one t look exactly like the struggle with new... From the beginning of chattel slavery economic inefficiency was the one underpinning this critique of slavery quoted. Genesis 1:27 stated that man was created in the changing economic milieu and political... Greater profitability and efficiency who met Adam Smith to many, however, the North argued slavery... Accepted and world trade in commodities opened up: You are commenting using your Google account spread. Textile industry its central narrative is incorrect into the world market from Cuba Brazil! Dominated by a rent-seeking elite, trapped the South and Great Britain reality is that cotton played a relatively role... This slash-and-burn economy, dominated by a rent-seeking elite, trapped the South Fear. Land and a limited supply of slaves in … Priestley 's economic arguments against slavery in U.S! Ruffin discussed these at length in his anti-slavery newspaper the... it Northern. Same time, the production of cotton in Northern States their potential political power it, fact!